Excerpt from the Judgement of Kashir Omer v Canada [Citation 2007 FC 478] which upheld that MQM is a terrorist organization.
[Source: http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/2007/2007fc478/2007fc478.html]
31. Having reviewed the Board’s reasons in light of the evidence presented, I find that the conclusion of the Board to the effect that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the MQM is an organization that engages, has engaged or will engage in terrorism, is reasonable. While the Board did not provide a detailed analysis of the documents on which it relied, as was done with the Amnesty International report in Khan, above, it identified a series of acts attributed to the MQM which it considered to be evidence of terrorist activities, and noted precisely where in the documentation submitted this evidence could be found. The Board not only relied on a number of different documents, but also explained why it found the information to be credible. As in Khan, above, while the evidence relied on by the Board might be less than proof on a balance of probabilities, it is more than a “flimsy suspicion” and does appear to be based on compelling and credible information. As such, the decision of the Board is reasonable and the Court will not interfere with it.
[Source: http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/2007/2007fc478/2007fc478.html]
No comments:
Post a Comment